data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cafdd/cafdd8d103e5986bf1472e10943dcbfc0c0358ca" alt="Utc time zones"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8060e/8060e4cc88c2b8bed873a62c4b66c5db173deaa2" alt="utc time zones utc time zones"
❌ The accepted Answer is neither correct nor useful. Current Millis with a simple and a complex take on UTC vs.I don’t think you got your example time exactly right, but yes, 2 January 2018 at 00:00 UTC is the same point in time as 1 January 2018 at 18:00 in Chicago and other places that are at UTC-6 in winter (winter on the Northern hemisphere, that is).Parts of Canada and Mexico use it too, of course, and also Galapagos and Easter Island. On the other hand, offset -6 doesn’t necessarily imply a time in the US. Central Standard Time (for example America/Chicago) is at offset -6, as is Mountain Daylight Time (for example America/Denver). The difference between the two will always be less than a second, so for many purposes you will not need to care. And I don’t know, but I suppose that today they (officially or in practice) define time as an offset from UTC rather than GMT. I suppose it’s up to each state of the US to define its time.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61609/61609107b934d3d159ed6579777c8860db4f340e" alt="utc time zones utc time zones"
Storing time in UTC and using UTC for transmitting date-time information is generally considered good practice. Yes, time can be captured in UTC alone.I take it that it is often used without regard to whether UTC is really intended, so don’t put too much trust into the strict definition given above. Since the world these days mostly bases precise definition of time on atomic clocks, it has become customary to base the definition of time on UTC instead.Įdit: The original meaning of GMT is somewhat useless these days, but the three letter combination doesn’t seem to go away. By contrast, in GMT the seconds are stretched as necessary, so in principle they don’t always have the same length.įor roughly 100 years GMT was used as the basis for defining time around the world. Leap seconds are inserted in UTC to keep UTC and GMT from drifting apart. In UTC a second always has the same length. UTC, which stands for Coordinated Universal Time in English, is defined by atomic clocks, but is otherwise the same. In GMT there can never be any leap seconds because Earth’s rotation doesn’t leap. Except: The Earth spins slightly unevenly, so 12 noon is defined as the annual average, mean of when the sun is at its highest, its culmination. When the sun is at its highest point exactly above Greenwich, it is 12 noon GMT. GMT stands for Greenwich Mean Time, the mean solar time at the Royal Observatory in Greenwich on the south bank in Eastern London, UK. Later GMT has become to be used at least unofficially to refer to UTC, which blurs the distinction somewhat. By the original definitions the difference is that GMT (also officially known as Universal Time (UT), which may be confusing) is based on astronomical observations while UTC is based on atomic clocks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cafdd/cafdd8d103e5986bf1472e10943dcbfc0c0358ca" alt="Utc time zones"